protect the cheaters, and how much do the rules protect the non-cheaters from the cheaters?
Reading list
- A Gentleman’s C
- Academic Coach
- Bitch, PhD
- Breaking Into the Academy
- Daves Mechanical Pencils
- Dean Dad
- efficient academic
- Financial rounds
- Learning Curves
- learning with linux
- Mimi Smartypants
- Mungowit’s End
- Playing School, Irreverently
- Second Order Approximation
- See Jane Compute
- Signifying Nothing
- Two Weeks Notice
- WordPress.com
- WordPress.org
Archives
- February 2010
- October 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
Pages
Meta
I’d say that there can’t BE cheaters without rules. So in that (Hobbesian) sense, the rules help cheaters.
But the net effect of having rules must still be positive, yes?
In theory yes. But in practice, the rules are costly-are they really enforced?
The question is whether or not the ‘level’ of rules is too high, too low, or just right? Are they setting marginal cost = marginal benefit in regards to cheating?
Немного не по теме, но смешно: Совет другу от подруги – еслиизнасилование неизбежно -расслабьтесь и насилуйте!